The mostly friendly Australian bird of the family Artamidae (not to be confused with the Corvidae of the European magpie) who uses this branch of cyberspace to express various comments and opinions from deep inside the Pacific Rim, bids you welcome...
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Fighting disease / Fighting for the Rights of Children
Positive action in Mogadishu, one of the worst places on the planet:
"10 February 2010 – Despite fighting that has displaced hundreds of thousands of people in Mogadishu, health workers have fanned out across the war-torn capital of Somalia in a three-month United Nations-backed campaign that has immunized nearly 300,000 women of child-bearing age and 288,000 children.
The children were vaccinated against polio, measles, diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus and provided with vitamin A supplements, de-worming tablets and nutritional screening, while the women were immunized against tetanus in the Child Health Days campaign, supported by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the UN World Health Organization (WHO) as part of a nationwide effort to provide life-saving health and nutrition services to every Somali child under the age of five and every woman of child-bearing age."
Rest of article here.
Incidentally, the Somali cabinet - such as it is - promised to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child last November, which would leave the United States has the only country in the world which has not.
Long a contentious issue, US conservatives love their "war" rhetoric:
"On February 14, 1995, war was declared on parental rights in America", splutters the Home School Legal Defense Association in a 'special report' in 1999, " On that day, the Clinton Administration announced that the United States would sign the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and send it to the U.S. Senate for ratification." Rest of that here.
And note this bit:
"If the United States ratifies the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the U.S. government will be obligated to “ensure” the following ... That every child shall receive the highest attainable level of health care services. Article 24 (1). In Chapter 11 of the American Bar Association book by Davidson and Cohen, they state that this provision indicates that a mandatory federal health insurance plan would be necessary to comply with the Treaty."
Oh dear... well they can't have THAT, can they?
And is it just me... or is any one else sick to death of conservatives stamping "declared war" over everyone who does not agree with them or give them what they want - even those in their own government?
What if I said to one of them "no, you can't drink my coffee"...? Have I "declared war" on their drinking habits...?
Among the other 'warlike' things the Convention does is... forbid executing juveniles.
Roper v. Simmons 2005 (one of those U.S. Supreme Court decisions that Sarah Palin can't think of other than Roe v. Wade) forbids this now anyway, but putting them away for life without parole is another thing you can't do under the Convention, and Roper v. Simmons does not cover this.
The book pictured is a children's book designed to encourage creative thinking. More about it here on the US AID East Africa site
Labels:
Medicine,
Rights of Children,
Somalia,
United Nations,
US politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dear Magpie,
ReplyDeleteYou would probably label me as one of those conservatives with nothing but rhetoric about the UN CRC. However, after much study of this treaty, I carry more than rhetoric. My blog www.parentalrightstn.blogspot.com should prove that. And for those who actually want a fuller story of the conservative's rhetoric, go to www.parentalrights.org and read for yourself. This is too important an issue to trust me or anyone else without studying it yourself.
Eric Potter MD
Thanks for commenting and leaving the links there Eric. We won't agree on some things but I appreciate you directing me toward your site.
ReplyDelete